Evaluation of Ca-P Coatings in Animal Experiments: Importance of Study Design
During the last decennium the research on oral implants has increased considerably. A lot of different implant materials and types have been tested, but differences in study design and evaluation criteria make comparison of the results difficult. The purpose of this paper is to discuss surgical, sta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of investigative surgery 1996, Vol.9 (6), p.463-479 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | During the last decennium the research on oral implants has increased considerably. A lot of different implant materials and types have been tested, but differences in study design and evaluation criteria make comparison of the results difficult. The purpose of this paper is to discuss surgical, statistical, and histological methods for testing and evaluating the biocompatibility of oral implants. Many formulas are available for calculating the required group size. The paper describes how such calculations can be used for the evaluation of implants and reviews the preferred surgical techniques. The control of various external influences that can contribute to the variability in obtained data are discussed. After implantation, the implants with their surrounding tissues are retrieved and subjected to histological evaluation. Currently, because of technical limitations. light microscopical sectioning is still the preferred preparation technique. After sectioning, quantitative analysis has to be pedormed. The parameters that can be evaluated are described. Finally, the use and potential of the described techniques are demonstrated with two examples |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0894-1939 1521-0553 |
DOI: | 10.3109/08941939609025864 |