Dissociated cerebral vasoparalysis in acute liver failure: A hypothesis of gradual cerebral hyperaemia
Background/Aims: Normally, cerebral blood flow responds to changes in the arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO 2) but not to changes in mean arterial pressure, commonly referred to as the cerebral CO 2-reactivity and autoregulation. In patients with fulminant hepatic failure and in the rat with thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hepatology 1996-08, Vol.25 (2), p.145-151 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background/Aims: Normally, cerebral blood flow responds to changes in the arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO
2) but not to changes in mean arterial pressure, commonly referred to as the cerebral CO
2-reactivity and autoregulation. In patients with fulminant hepatic failure and in the rat with thioacetamide-induced liver failure, autoregulation is absent, presumably due to cerebral vasoparalysis. Since also CO
2-reactivity may then be compromised, it was studied in patients with fulminant hepatic failure and rats with thioacetamide-induced liver failure.
Methods: In ten patients (median age 32 (range 20–48) years)) and in ten age-matched volunteers, cerebral perfusion was evaluated by transcranial Doppler assessed mean flow velocity (V
mean) in the middle cerebral artery during hypo- and hyper-capnia. In six rats with liver failure and in six control rats, cerebral blood flow was measured repeatedly by the intracarotid
133Xenon injection technique.
Results: In the patients and volunteers, PaCO
2 was lowered from 33 (23–44) to 28 (23–39) mmHg by hypocapnia and raised to 40 (34–48) mmHg by hypercapnia or 5% CO
2 inhalation. During hypocapnia, the CO
2-reactivity did not differ significantly between patients and volunteers, 4.0 (1.1–7.4) vs. 3.0 (1.7–5.0)% mmHg
−1, while it was reduced during hypercapnia in the patients, 2.2 (1.8–5.2) vs. 4.6 (3.0–8.0)% mmHg
−1 (
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0168-8278 1600-0641 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0168-8278(96)80066-3 |