The PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis persists as a therapeutic dependency in KRAS G12D -driven non-small cell lung cancer
KRAS and KRAS inhibitors represent a major translational breakthrough for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cancer in general by directly targeting its most mutated oncoprotein. However, resistance to these small molecules has highlighted the need for rational combination partners necessitating...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular cancer 2024-11, Vol.23 (1), p.253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | KRAS
and KRAS
inhibitors represent a major translational breakthrough for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cancer in general by directly targeting its most mutated oncoprotein. However, resistance to these small molecules has highlighted the need for rational combination partners necessitating a critical understanding of signaling downstream of KRAS mutant isoforms.
We contrasted tumor development between Kras
and Kras
genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs). To corroborate findings and determine mutant subtype-specific dependencies, isogenic models of Kras
and Kras
initiation and adaptation were profiled by RNA sequencing. We also employed cell line models of established KRAS mutant NSCLC and determined therapeutic vulnerabilities through pharmacological inhibition. We analysed differences in survival outcomes for patients affected by advanced KRAS
or KRAS
-mutant NSCLC.
KRAS
exhibited higher potency in vivo, manifesting as more rapid lung tumor formation and reduced survival of KRAS
GEMMs compared to KRAS
. This increased potency, recapitulated in an isogenic initiation model, was associated with enhanced PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling. However, KRAS
oncogenicity and downstream pathway activation were comparable with KRAS
at later stages of tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo, consistent with similar clinical outcomes in patients. Despite this, established KRAS
NSCLC models depended more on the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, while KRAS
models on the MAPK pathway. Specifically, KRAS
inhibition was enhanced by AKT inhibition in vitro and in vivo.
Our data highlight a unique combination treatment vulnerability and suggest that patient selection strategies for combination approaches using direct KRAS inhibitors should be i) contextualised to individual RAS mutants, and ii) tailored to their downstream signaling. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-4598 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12943-024-02157-x |