A prospective study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 99m Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in staging of non-small cell lung cancer

To explore the value of Tc-isonitrile deoxyglucosamine (CNDG) SPECT/CT in the staging and resectability diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). This research was approved by the hospital ethics review committee. Sixty-three patients with NSCLC received Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT, CECT and initial TNM staging before treatment. Thirty-three patients who underwent radical surgery underwent postoperative pathological TNM staging as the reference standard. Another thirty patients underwent radiochemotherapy; among them, the reference standard of 7 patients of N staging and 5 patients of M staging was based on biopsy pathology, and the diagnosis of the remaining lesions was confirmed by at least one different image or clinical imaging follow-up for more than 3 months. The McNemar test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of staging and resectability of Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT and CECT in NSCLC, respectively. For all patients and surgical patients, the accuracies of Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT in diagnosing the T stage and N stage were higher than those of CECT (all patients: 90.5%, 88.9% vs. 79.4%, 60.3%; surgical patients: 81.8%, 78.8% vs. 60.6%, 51.5%), and the differences were statistically significant (all patients: T stage, P = 0.016; N stage, P = 0.000; surgical patients: T stage, P = 0.016; N stage, P = 0.004). For all patients, the accuracy of Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT in diagnosing the M stage was higher than that of CECT (96.8% vs. 90.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.289). ROC curve analysis showed that the accuracy of Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT in diagnosing the potential resectability of NSCLC was significantly better than that of CECT (P = 0.046). This preliminary clinical study shows that Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT is of great value for accurate clinical staging of NSCLC compared with CECT and can significantly improve the accuracy of resectability diagnosis.