Benefits of upgrading right ventricular to biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation

Recommendations on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) are based on less robust evidence than those in sinus rhythm (SR). We aimed to assess the efficacy of CRT upgrade in the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade trial population by their baseline rhythm. Hea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Europace (London, England) England), 2024-07, Vol.26 (7)
Hauptverfasser: Merkely, Béla, Hatala, Robert, Merkel, Eperke, Szigeti, Mátyás, Veres, Boglárka, Fábián, Alexandra, Osztheimer, István, Gellér, László, Sasov, Michal, Wranicz, Jerzy K, Földesi, Csaba, Duray, Gábor, Solomon, Scott D, Kutyifa, Valentina, Kovács, Attila, Kosztin, Annamária
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recommendations on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) are based on less robust evidence than those in sinus rhythm (SR). We aimed to assess the efficacy of CRT upgrade in the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade trial population by their baseline rhythm. Heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and previously implanted pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and ≥20% right ventricular (RV) pacing burden were randomized to CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) upgrade (n = 215) or ICD (n = 145). Primary [HF hospitalization (HFH), all-cause mortality, or
ISSN:1532-2092
DOI:10.1093/europace/euae179