A Randomized Noninferiority Trial to Compare Enteral to Parenteral Phosphate Replacement on Biochemistry, Waste, and Environmental Impact and Healthcare Cost in Critically Ill Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypophosphatemia

Hypophosphatemia occurs frequently. Enteral, rather than IV, phosphate replacement may reduce fluid replacement, cost, and waste. Prospective, randomized, parallel group, noninferiority clinical trial. Single center, 42-bed state trauma, medical and surgical ICUs, from April 20, 2022, to July 1, 202...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 2024-07, Vol.52 (7), p.1054
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Chinh D, Panganiban, Haustine P, Fazio, Timothy, Karahalios, Amalia, Ankravs, Melissa J, MacIsaac, Christopher M, Rechnitzer, Thomas, Arno, Lucy, Tran-Duy, An, McAlister, Scott, Ali Abdelhamid, Yasmine, Deane, Adam M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hypophosphatemia occurs frequently. Enteral, rather than IV, phosphate replacement may reduce fluid replacement, cost, and waste. Prospective, randomized, parallel group, noninferiority clinical trial. Single center, 42-bed state trauma, medical and surgical ICUs, from April 20, 2022, to July 1, 2022. Patients with serum phosphate concentration between 0.3 and 0.75 mmol/L. We randomized patients to either enteral or IV phosphate replacement using electronic medical record-embedded program. Our primary outcome was serum phosphate at 24 hours with a noninferiority margin of 0.2 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes included cost savings and environmental waste reduction and additional IV fluid administered. The modified intention-to-treat cohort comprised 131 patients. Baseline phosphate concentrations were similar between the two groups. At 24 hours, mean ( sd ) serum phosphate concentration were enteral 0.89 mmol/L (0.24 mmol/L) and IV 0.82 mmol/L (0.28 mmol/L). This difference was noninferior at the margin of 0.2 mmol/L (difference, 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.17 mmol/L). When assigned IV replacement, patients received 408 mL (372 mL) of solvent IV fluid. Compared with IV replacement, the mean cost per patient was ten-fold less with enteral replacement ($3.7 [$4.0] vs. IV: $37.7 [$31.4]; difference = $34.0 [95% CI, $26.3-$41.7]) and weight of waste was less (7.7 g [8.3 g] vs. 217 g [169 g]; difference = 209 g [95% CI, 168-250 g]). C O2 emissions were 60-fold less for comparable phosphate replacement (enteral: 2 g producing 14.2 g and 20 mmol of potassium dihydrogen phosphate producing 843 g of C O2 equivalents). Enteral phosphate replacement in ICU is noninferior to IV replacement at a margin of 0.2 mmol/L but leads to a substantial reduction in cost and waste.
ISSN:1530-0293
DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006255