Is Native Naïve? Comparing Native Game Engines and WebXR as Immersive Analytics Development Platforms
Native game engines have long been the 3-D development platform of choice for research in mixed and augmented reality. For this reason, they have also been adopted in many immersive visualization and immersive analytics systems and toolkits. However, with the rapid improvements of WebXR and related...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE computer graphics and applications 2024-05, Vol.44 (3), p.91-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Native game engines have long been the 3-D development platform of choice for research in mixed and augmented reality. For this reason, they have also been adopted in many immersive visualization and immersive analytics systems and toolkits. However, with the rapid improvements of WebXR and related open technologies, this choice may not always be optimal for future visualization research. In this article, we investigate common assumptions about native game engines versus WebXR and find that while native engines still have an advantage in many areas, WebXR is rapidly catching up and is superior for many immersive analytics applications. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0272-1716 1558-1756 1558-1756 |
DOI: | 10.1109/MCG.2024.3367422 |