Comparison of different methods of first‐trimester screening for preterm pre‐eclampsia: cohort study

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the predictive performance of three different mathematical models for first‐trimester screening of pre‐eclampsia (PE), which combine maternal risk factors with mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI) and serum placental growth factor (PlG...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2024-07, Vol.64 (1), p.57-64
Hauptverfasser: Cuenca‐Gómez, D., De Paco Matallana, C., Rolle, V., Mendoza, M., Valiño, N., Revello, R., Adiego, B., Casanova, M. C., Molina, F. S., Delgado, J. L., Wright, A., Figueras, F., Nicolaides, K. H., Santacruz, B., Gil, M. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Objective To compare the predictive performance of three different mathematical models for first‐trimester screening of pre‐eclampsia (PE), which combine maternal risk factors with mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI) and serum placental growth factor (PlGF), and two risk‐scoring systems. Methods This was a prospective cohort study performed in eight fetal medicine units in five different regions of Spain between September 2017 and December 2019. All pregnant women with singleton pregnancy and a non‐malformed live fetus attending their routine ultrasound examination at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation were invited to participate in the study. Maternal characteristics and medical history were recorded and measurements of MAP, UtA‐PI, serum PlGF and pregnancy‐associated plasma protein‐A (PAPP‐A) were converted into multiples of the median (MoM). Risks for term PE, preterm PE (
ISSN:0960-7692
1469-0705
1469-0705
DOI:10.1002/uog.27622