How to obtain the image-derived blood concentration from 89 Zr-immuno-PET scans
PET scans using zirconium-89 labelled monoclonal antibodies ( Zr-mAbs), known as Zr-immuno-PET, are made to measure uptake in tumour and organ tissue. Uptake is related to the supply of Zr-mAbs in the blood. Measuring activity concentrations in blood, however, requires invasive blood sampling. This...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | EJNMMI physics 2024-02, Vol.11 (1), p.16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PET scans using zirconium-89 labelled monoclonal antibodies (
Zr-mAbs), known as
Zr-immuno-PET, are made to measure uptake in tumour and organ tissue. Uptake is related to the supply of
Zr-mAbs in the blood. Measuring activity concentrations in blood, however, requires invasive blood sampling. This study aims to identify the best delineation strategy to obtain the image-derived blood concentration (IDBC) from
Zr-immuno-PET scans.
PET imaging and blood sampling of two
Zr-mAbs were included,
Zr-cetuximab and
Zr-durvalumab. For seven patients receiving
Zr-cetuximab, PET scans on 1-2 h, 2 and 6 days post-injection (p.i.) were analysed. Five patients received three injections of
Zr-durvalumab. The scanning protocol for the first two injections consisted of PET scanning on 2, 5 and 7 days p.i. and for the third injection only on 7 days p.i. Blood samples were drawn with every PET scan and the sample-derived blood concentration (SDBC) was used as gold standard for the IDBC. According to an in-house developed standard operating procedure, the aortic arch, ascending aorta, descending aorta and left ventricle were delineated. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to assess the bias (mean difference) and variability (1.96 times the standard deviation of the differences) between IDBC and SDBC.
Overall, the activity concentration obtained from the IDBC was lower than from the SDBC. When comparing IDBC with SDBC, variability was smallest for the ascending aorta (20.3% and 17.0% for
Zr-cetuximab and
Zr-durvalumab, respectively). Variability for the other regions ranged between 17.9 and 30.8%. Bias for the ascending aorta was - 10.9% and - 11.4% for
Zr-cetuximab and
Zr-durvalumab, respectively.
Image-derived blood concentrations should be obtained from delineating the ascending aorta in
Zr-immuno-PET scans, as this results in the lowest variability with respect to sample-derived blood concentrations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2197-7364 2197-7364 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s40658-024-00621-7 |