Remineralization effects of enamel binding peptide, WGNYAYK, on enamel subsurface demineralization in vi tro. Enamel binding peptide, WGNYAYK effect remineralization of enamel

We investigated remineralization effects of enamel binding peptide (EBP), WGNYAYK, on enamel subsurface demineralization . Bovine lower incisor crowns were used as subsurface enamel demineralization samples, and changes of EBP binding, remineraliztion rate, hardness and microstructure were investiga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heliyon 2024-01, Vol.10 (1), p.e23176
Hauptverfasser: Miyayoshi, Yoshihito, Hamba, Hidenori, Nakamura, Keiki, Ishizuka, Hisako, Muramatsu, Takashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We investigated remineralization effects of enamel binding peptide (EBP), WGNYAYK, on enamel subsurface demineralization . Bovine lower incisor crowns were used as subsurface enamel demineralization samples, and changes of EBP binding, remineraliztion rate, hardness and microstructure were investigated. Binding of EBP, remineralization rate, hardness and structural changes were investigated. Fluorescein isothiocyatate (FITC)-labeled EBPs (0.4 mM, 4.0 mM, and 7.0 mM) were applied to the samples for 30 min at 37 °C, with sample surfaces and cross-sections observed by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Mineralization analysis samples were divided into 4 experimental groups; distilled water (DW), EBP 0.4 mM, EBP 4.0 mM, and EBP 7.0 mM. Mineral density changes were measured by micro-CT with hardness measured by nano-indentation. Samples were also observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) for surface and longitudinal microstructure. CLSM images indicated that increased fluorescence was observed in the surface layer and up to about 20 μm below the surface layer. The remineralization rate was significantly higher for EBP 7.0 mM compared to DW (  = 0.008). Enamel surface hardness was significantly higher in all EBP groups compared to DW (  
ISSN:2405-8440
2405-8440
DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23176