Hyperpolarized 129 Xe MRI, 99m Tc scintigraphy, and SPECT in lung ventilation imaging: a quantitative comparison

The current clinical standard for functional imaging of patients with lung ailments is nuclear medicine scintigraphy and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) which detect the gamma decay of inhaled radioactive tracers. Hyperpolarized (HP) Xenon-129 MRI (XeMRI) of the lungs has recently...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic radiology 2024-04, Vol.31 (4), p.1666
Hauptverfasser: Peiffer, J D, Altes, Talissa, Ruset, Iulian C, Hersman, F W, Mugler, 3rd, John P, Meyer, Craig H, Mata, Jamie, Qing, Kun, Thomen, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The current clinical standard for functional imaging of patients with lung ailments is nuclear medicine scintigraphy and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) which detect the gamma decay of inhaled radioactive tracers. Hyperpolarized (HP) Xenon-129 MRI (XeMRI) of the lungs has recently been FDA approved and provides similar functional images of the lungs with higher spatial resolution than scintigraphy and SPECT. Here we compare Technetium-99m ( Tc) diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate scintigraphy and SPECT with HP XeMRI in healthy controls, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) patients. 59 subjects, healthy, with asthma, and with COPD, underwent Tc scintigraphy/SPECT, standard spirometry, and HP XeMRI. XeMRI and SPECT images were registered for direct voxel-wise signal comparisons. Images were also compared using ventilation defect percentage (VDP), and a standard 6-compartment method. VDP calculated from XeMRI and SPECT images was compared to spirometry. Median Pearson correlation coefficient for voxel-wise signal comparison was 0.698 (0.613-0.782) between scintigraphy and XeMRI and 0.398 (0.286-0.502) between SPECT and XeMRI. Correlation between VDP measures was r = 0.853, p 
ISSN:1878-4046
DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.038