Postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T 1-2 N 1 breast cancer: a single center experience and a meta-analysis

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T N breast cancer is still controversial. This study was to evaluate the survival prognosis of T N patients with or without PMRT. From January 2006 to May 2017, 2606 female breast cancer patients underwent mastectomy in our medical center, among wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2023-09, Vol.149 (12), p.9979
Hauptverfasser: Luo, Meng, Jin, Yao, Xu, Chunjing, Chen, Huihui, Zhang, Kun, Chen, Qiang, Jin, Chencan, Lu, Jinglu, Wang, Jing, Huang, Jia, Deng, Hao, Jin, Weili, Zheng, Shu, Chen, Yiding, Zhou, Jiaojiao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T N breast cancer is still controversial. This study was to evaluate the survival prognosis of T N patients with or without PMRT. From January 2006 to May 2017, 2606 female breast cancer patients underwent mastectomy in our medical center, among whom 402 patients of T N stage with or without PMRT were finally analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 59.5 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). In the study of our center, no statistically significant difference was observed between the T N PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups for the 5-year OS (94.4% vs 95.4%, p = 0.667) and DFS (90.1% vs. 91.1%, p = 0.798). By the date of the last follow-up, 8.96% (n = 36) of the patients experienced any recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed that PMRT was not a prognostic factor for either OS (p = 0.667) or DFS (p = 0.798) in T N patients. We then did a meta-analysis on the current treatment patterns, in which 2606 PMRT and 4281 non-PMRT T N breast cancer patients with mastectomy were included. The meta-analysis showed that PMRT didn't improve the OS of the patients (HR = 0.85, p = 0.11), but patients with PMRT had better DFS than those in the non-PMRT group (HR = 0.62, p 
ISSN:1432-1335