Locoregional treatment of primary tumor in synchronous metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Patients with synchronous metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (mHNSCC) are at risk of locoregional progression associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to assess whether the addition of aggressive locoregional treatment to systemic therapy could be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta oncologica 2023-05, Vol.62 (5), p.465-472
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Eliane, Schwartz, Boris, Limkin, Elaine, Even, Caroline, Blanchard, Pierre, Haddy, Nadia, Gorphe, Philippe, Ferrand, François-Régis, Tao, Yungan, Nguyen, Thanh-Van-France
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patients with synchronous metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (mHNSCC) are at risk of locoregional progression associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to assess whether the addition of aggressive locoregional treatment to systemic therapy could be associated with an improved overall survival (OS) compared to systemic therapy alone in upfront mHNSCC patients. This retrospective study included patients presenting with previously untreated mHNSCC who underwent first-line systemic therapy at a single institution between 1998 and 2018. Locoregional treatment was defined as either exclusive locoregional radiotherapy (RT) or surgery with or without adjuvant RT. One hundred forty-eight patients were included. Eighty patients were treated with systemic therapy alone and 68 patients were treated with a combination of locoregional treatment and systemic therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 13 months [10.7-15] and median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 month [6.5-8.9]. The addition of a locoregional treatment to systemic therapy compared to systemic therapy alone was associated with improved survival (1-year OS, 65.8% vs. 41.1%, p 
ISSN:0284-186X
1651-226X
DOI:10.1080/0284186X.2023.2209266