ACACIA 1: The physiological and subjective impacts of high fidelity simulation of the breaking of bad news

Breaking bad news (BN) is difficult and necessitates targeted training. To be effective, training may call for High Fidelity Simulation (HFS). This prospective study was conducted to objectively assess the impact of HFS as a tool conducive to the development of clinical competence in situations invo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of visceral surgery 2023-03
Hauptverfasser: Deluche, E, Salle, H, Leobon, S, Facchini-Joguet, T, Fourcade, L, Taibi, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Breaking bad news (BN) is difficult and necessitates targeted training. To be effective, training may call for High Fidelity Simulation (HFS). This prospective study was conducted to objectively assess the impact of HFS as a tool conducive to the development of clinical competence in situations involving the delivery of bad news. This feasibility study was conducted from January to May 2021 and included students in medical oncology and digestive surgery. The subjective and objective impacts of HFS were evaluated by means of a self-administered questionnaire and a wristband, Affect-tag, which recorded several indicators: emotional power (EP), emotional density (DE) and cognitive load (CL) in students undergoing training. Forty-six (46) students with a median age of 25 years (21-34 years) were included. While the participants were effectively and emotionally involved in the HFS training, they were not completely overwhelmed by their emotions, a possible occurrence in this type of program. After two training programs, the students presented with lower EP (P
ISSN:1878-7886
DOI:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.03.006