A combined subcision approach with either fractional CO 2 laser (10,600 nm) or cross-linked hyaluronic acid versus subcision alone in atrophic post-acne scar treatment
Different treatment options for post-acne scars exist, but with varying clinical efficacy, side effects, and prolonged downtime. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of combined subcision with either fractional CO laser or cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler (HA) versus subcision alone...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lasers in medical science 2022-12, Vol.38 (1), p.20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Different treatment options for post-acne scars exist, but with varying clinical efficacy, side effects, and prolonged downtime. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of combined subcision with either fractional CO
laser or cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler (HA) versus subcision alone in the treatment of facial atrophic post-acne scars. Forty patients with atrophic post-acne scars were subjected to subcision on both sides of the face, then were randomly divided into three groups. Group I (20 patients): subcision combined with cross-linked HA filler injection at one side of the face; group II (20 patients): subcision followed by fractional CO
at the other side of the face; and group III (20 patients): with subcision only as a control group. Treatment sessions were every month until clinical improvement or for maximum three sessions. The treatment's efficacy was assessed by Goodman and Baron's qualitative and quantitative grading systems. The two blinded investigator scores showed significant improvement in both the filler side versus subcision (p value = 0.015), and the fractional laser side versus subcision (p value |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1435-604X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10103-022-03677-y |