Evaluation of standardized uptake value on 131 I-6β-iodomethyl-19-norcholesterol scintigraphy for diagnosis of primary aldosteronism and correspondence with adrenal venous sampling

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is a reliable method for lateralization of adrenal hormone secretion, which is important for discriminating between aldosterone-producing adenoma and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, both of which cause primary aldosteronism (PA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of nuclear medicine 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.89
Hauptverfasser: Sato, Tomohiro, Matsutomo, Norikazu, Yamamoto, Tomoaki, Fukami, Mitsuha, Kono, Takashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is a reliable method for lateralization of adrenal hormone secretion, which is important for discriminating between aldosterone-producing adenoma and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, both of which cause primary aldosteronism (PA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV and SUV , respectively) of I-6β-iodomethyl-19-norcholesterol (NP-59) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for PA and its correspondence with AVS. Adrenal NP-59 scintigraphy was performed in 14 patients with suspected PA, and AVS was also performed in 7 of them. SUV and SUV of the adrenal lesions on the dominant side and their ratios to the values on the non-dominant side (SUVR and SUVR , respectively) were calculated on SPECT images using ordered-subset conjugate gradient minimization (OSCGM) and three-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization (3D-OSEM) reconstruction algorithms. SUV and SUV on NP-59 SPECT images were significantly higher for aldosterone-producing adenoma than for bilateral adrenal hyperplasia or non-functioning adenoma and slightly superior to SUVR and SUVR (P = 0.0475 and P = 0.0447 vs. P = 0.124 and P = 0.132, respectively, with OSCGM). The respective areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for SUV and SUVR were 0.933 and 0.725 with OSCGM and 0.844 and 0.750 with 3D-OSEM, while SUV and SUVR had exactly the same diagnostic accuracy as SUV and SUVR . SUV and SUVR were associated with the diagnostic features on AVS and consistent with lateralization by AVS in most patients. In this study, SUV on NP-59 SPECT helped in the diagnosis of PA and was consistent with the results of AVS in nearly all cases.
ISSN:1864-6433