Simultaneous monitoring of HIV viral load and screening of SARS-CoV-2 employing a low-cost RT-qPCR test workflow

The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted routine care for individuals living with HIV, putting them at risk of virologic failure and HIV-associated illness. Often this population is at high risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and once infected, for severe disease. Therefore, close monitoring of HIV...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analyst (London) 2022-07, Vol.147 (14), p.3315-3327
Hauptverfasser: Gulati, Gaurav K, Panpradist, Nuttada, Stewart, Samuel W. A, Beck, Ingrid A, Boyce, Ceejay, Oreskovic, Amy K, García-Morales, Claudia, Avila-Ríos, Santiago, Han, Peter D, Reyes-Terán, Gustavo, Starita, Lea M, Frenkel, Lisa M, Lutz, Barry R, Lai, James J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted routine care for individuals living with HIV, putting them at risk of virologic failure and HIV-associated illness. Often this population is at high risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and once infected, for severe disease. Therefore, close monitoring of HIV plasma viral load (VL) and screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection are needed. We developed a non-proprietary method to isolate RNA from plasma, nasal secretions (NS), or both. The extracted RNA is then submitted to RT-qPCR to estimate the VL and classify HIV/SARS-CoV-2 status ( i.e. , HIV virologic failure or suppressed; SARS-CoV-2 as positive, presumptive positive, negative, or indeterminate). In contrived samples, the in-house RNA extraction workflow achieved a detection limit of 200-copies per mL for HIV RNA in plasma and 100-copies per mL for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in NS. Similar detection limits were observed for HIV and SARS-CoV-2 in pooled plasma/NS contrived samples. When comparing in-house with standard extraction methods, we found high agreement (>0.91) between input and measured RNA copies for HIV LTR in contrived plasma; SARS-CoV-2 N1/N2 in contrived NS; and LTR, N1, and N2 in pooled plasma/NS samples. We further evaluated this workflow on 133 clinical specimens: 40 plasma specimens (30 HIV-positive), 67 NS specimens (31 SARS-CoV-2-positive), and 26 combined plasma/NS specimens (26 HIV-positive with 10 SARS-CoV-2-positive), and compared the results obtained using the in-house RNA extraction to those using a commercial kit (standard extraction method). The in-house extraction and standard extraction of clinical specimens were positively correlated: plasma HIV VL ( R 2 of 0.81) and NS SARS-CoV-2 VL ( R 2 of 0.95 and 0.99 for N1 and N2 genes, respectively); and pooled plasma/NS HIV VL ( R 2 of 0.71) and SARS-CoV-2 VL ( R 2 of 1 both for N1 and N2 genes). Our low-cost molecular test workflow ($1.85 per pooled sample extraction) for HIV RNA and SARS-CoV-2 RNA could serve as an alternative to current standard assays ($12 per pooled sample extraction) for laboratories in low-resource settings. This new workflow enables co-extraction of HIV and SARS-CoV2 RNAs from clinical pooled plasma/nasal secretion samples that allows sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 and HIV infections in the patients-living with HIV.
ISSN:0003-2654
1364-5528
1364-5528
DOI:10.1039/d2an00405d