Quantitative assessment of regional lung ventilation in emphysematous mice using hyperpolarized 129 Xe MRI with a continuous flow hyperpolarizing system

Lung ventilation function in small animals can be assessed by using hyperpolarized gas MRI. For these experiments a free breathing protocol is generally preferred to mechanical ventilation as mechanical ventilation can often lead to ventilation lung injury, while the need to maintain a gas reservoir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance imaging 2022-05
Hauptverfasser: Wakayama, Tetsuya, Ueyama, Tsuyoshi, Imai, Fumito, Kimura, Atsuomi, Fujiwara, Hideaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Lung ventilation function in small animals can be assessed by using hyperpolarized gas MRI. For these experiments a free breathing protocol is generally preferred to mechanical ventilation as mechanical ventilation can often lead to ventilation lung injury, while the need to maintain a gas reservoir may lead to a partial reduction of the polarization. To evaluate regional lung ventilation of mice by a simple but fast method under free breathing and give evidence for effectiveness with an elastase instilled emphysematous mice. Emphysematous mice. A Look-Locker based saturation recovery sequence was developed for continuous flow hyperpolarized (CF-HP) Xe gas experiments, and the apparent gas-exchange rate, k', was measured by the analysis of the saturation recovery curve. In mice with elastase-induced mild emphysema, reductions of 15-30% in k' values were observed as the results of lesion-induced changes in the lung. The proposed method was applied to an emphysematous model mice and ventilation dysfunctions have been approved as a definite decrease in k' values, supporting the usefulness for a non-invasive assessment of the lung functions in preclinical study by the CF-HP Xe experiments.
ISSN:1873-5894
DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2022.05.017