Low molecular weight heparin plus dihydroergotamine for prophylaxis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis

In a prospective, double‐blind investigation of the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, 269 patients were randomized into two groups. One hundred and thirty‐two patients received a fixed combination of heparin sodium 5000 units plus dihy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of surgery 1986-09, Vol.73 (9), p.697-700
Hauptverfasser: Sasahara, A. A., Koppenhagen, K., Häring, R., Welzel, D., Wolf, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a prospective, double‐blind investigation of the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, 269 patients were randomized into two groups. One hundred and thirty‐two patients received a fixed combination of heparin sodium 5000 units plus dihydroergotamine mesylate 0.5 mg (H/DHE) twice a day and 137 patients received a fixed combination of low molecular weight heparin 1500 units plus dihydroergotamine mesylate 0.5 mg (LMWH/DHE) once a day as well as one injection of placebo per day. Treatment was initiated 2 h pre‐operatively in both groups and continued for 7–10 days. The frequency of DVT determined by the 125I‐labelled fibrinogen uptake test and phlebography was 10.3 per cent in patients receiving H/DHE and 10.4 per cent in those receiving LMWH/DHE. DVT of the femoral vein was detected in four patients of the H/DHE group and in none of the LMWH/DHE group. Intra‐ and postoperative blood loss did not differ significantly between both groups. Also no difference in the development of wound haematoma and injection site haematoma was found. While intra‐operative volume substitution was comparable in both groups, significantly more patients under H/DHE prophylaxis received volume substitution during the postoperative phase. These results show that once‐daily prophylaxis with the combination of low molecular weight heparin and dihydroergotamine is equally as effective and as safe as the twice‐daily regimen using a combination of unfractionated heparin and dihydroergotamine in patients undergoing elective, major abdominal surgery. The advantages of the once‐daily regimen of LMWH/DHE include greater patient acceptance, less nursing time and greater cost effectiveness, provided the new combination can be sold at a cost which maintains this advantage.
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800730906