How does puncture modality affect the risk of intraoperative bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A prospective randomized trial

To evaluate the possible effects of two different renal puncture techniques (ultrasound-assisted [US-assisted], fluoroscopic-guided [FG]) on the intraoperative hemorrhage risk during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A total of 130 patients with Guy stone scores of 1-2 were prospectively allocate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Actas urológicas españolas (English ed.) 2021-09
Hauptverfasser: Sahan, A, Cubuk, A, Ozkaptan, O, Ertas, K, Toprak, T, Eryildirim, B, Sarica, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the possible effects of two different renal puncture techniques (ultrasound-assisted [US-assisted], fluoroscopic-guided [FG]) on the intraoperative hemorrhage risk during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A total of 130 patients with Guy stone scores of 1-2 were prospectively allocated to US-assisted and FG puncture groups by simple randomization. Patients with intraoperative pelvicalyceal rupture and the ones requiring multiple accesses were excluded from the study. Apart from the puncture steps, all other steps of the PCNL procedure were performed with similar techniques by a single surgeon. Patient characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were compared. A total of 10 patients were excluded from the study due to intraoperative complications after puncture. Patient demographics and stone characteristics were similar between the two groups (P>.05). Mean hemoglobin drop was meaningfully greater in the FG group (1.7g/dL) when compared with US-assisted group (1.3g/dL) (P.05). US-assisted puncture provides significantly decreased level of hemoglobin drop and radiation exposure time when compared with FG.
ISSN:2173-5786
DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2020.10.011