A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain - a secondary outcome analysis

BackgroundNeck pain is prevalent among office workers. This study evaluated the impact of an ergonomic and exercise training (EET) intervention and an ergonomic and health promotion (EHP) intervention on neck pain intensity among the All Workers and a subgroup of Neck Pain cases at baseline.MethodsA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2021-01, Vol.22 (1), p.68-68, Article 68
Hauptverfasser: Johnston, Venerina, Chen, Xiaoqi, Welch, Alyssa, Sjogaard, Gisela, Comans, Tracy A., McStea, Megan, Straker, Leon, Melloh, Markus, Pereira, Michelle, O'Leary, Shaun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundNeck pain is prevalent among office workers. This study evaluated the impact of an ergonomic and exercise training (EET) intervention and an ergonomic and health promotion (EHP) intervention on neck pain intensity among the All Workers and a subgroup of Neck Pain cases at baseline.MethodsA 12-month cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 14 public and private organisations. Office workers aged >= 18years working >= 30h per week (n=740) received an individualised workstation ergonomic intervention, followed by 1:1 allocation to the EET group (neck-specific exercise training), or the EHP group (health promotion) for 12weeks. Neck pain intensity (scale: 0-9) was recorded at baseline, 12weeks, and 12months. Participants with data at these three time points were included for analysis (n=367). Intervention group differences were analysed using generalized estimating equation models on an intention-to-treat basis and adjusted for potential confounders. Subgroup analysis was performed on neck cases reporting pain >= 3 at baseline (n=96).ResultsThe EET group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in neck pain intensity at 12weeks compared to the EHP group for All Workers (EET: beta=-0.53 points 95% CI: -0.84- -0.22 [36%] and EHP: beta=-0.17 points 95% CI: -0.47-0.13 [10.5%], p-value=0.02) and the Neck Cases (EET: beta=-2.32 points 95% CI: -3.09- -1.56 [53%] and EHP: beta=-1.75 points 95% CI: -2.35- -1.16 [36%], p=0.04). Reductions in pain intensity were not maintained at 12months with no between-group differences observed in All Workers (EET: beta=-0.18, 95% CI: -0.53-0.16 and EHP: beta=-0.14 points 95% CI: -0.49-0.21, p=0.53) or Neck Cases, although in both groups an overall reduction was found (EET: beta=-1.61 points 95% CI: -2.36- -0.89 and EHP: beta=-1.9 points 95% CI: -2.59- -1.20, p=0.26).ConclusionEET was more effective than EHP in reducing neck pain intensity in All Workers and Neck Cases immediately following the intervention period (12weeks) but not at 12months, with changes at 12weeks reaching clinically meaningful thresholds for the Neck Cases. Findings suggest the need for continuation of exercise to maintain benefits in the longer term.Clinical trial registrationhACTRN12612001154897 Date of Registration: 31/10/2012.
ISSN:1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-021-03945-y