Effects of Virtual Reality vs Conventional Balance Training on Balance and Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To assess the efficacy of virtual reality (VR)-based vs conventional balance training on the improvement of balance and reduction of falls in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur Univers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2021-02, Vol.102 (2), p.290-299
Hauptverfasser: Molhemi, Farshad, Monjezi, Saeideh, Mehravar, Mohammad, Shaterzadeh-Yazdi, Mohammad-Jafar, Salehi, Reza, Hesam, Saeed, Mohammadianinejad, Ehsan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess the efficacy of virtual reality (VR)-based vs conventional balance training on the improvement of balance and reduction of falls in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. PwMS (N=39), randomized into VR (n=19) and control (n=20) groups. The VR group performed exergames using Kinect, while the control group accomplished conventional balance exercises. Both groups received 18 training sessions for 6 weeks. Limits of stability, timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and 10-m walk tests with and without cognitive task and their dual-task costs (DTCs), Berg Balance Scale, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, Fall Efficacy Scale-International, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, and fall history were obtained pre- and post intervention and after a 3-month follow-up. At both post intervention and follow-up, TUGcognitive and DTCs on the TUG were significantly lower and the 10-m walkcognitive was significantly higher in the VR group. At follow-up, reaction time and the number of falls demonstrated significant differences favoring the VR group, whereas the directional control revealed significant difference in favor of the control group (P
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.395