Effects of Protein and Calorie Restriction on the Metabolism and Toxicity Profile of Irinotecan in Cancer Patients

Preclinical data suggests that protein and calorie restriction (PCR) might improve treatment tolerability without impairing antitumor efficacy. Therefore, we have studied the influence of PCR on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity. In this crossover trial, patients with liver metastases of soli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2021-05, Vol.109 (5), p.1304-1313
Hauptverfasser: Man, Femke M., Eerden, Ruben A.G., Doorn, Gerdien M., Oomen‐de Hoop, Esther, Koolen, Stijn L.W., Olieman, Joanne F., Bruijn, Peter, Veraart, Joris N., Halteren, Henk K., Sandberg, Yorick, Moelker, Adriaan, IJzermans, Jan N.M., Lolkema, Martijn P., Gelder, Teun, Dollé, Martijn E.T., Bruin, Ron W.F., Mathijssen, Ron H.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Preclinical data suggests that protein and calorie restriction (PCR) might improve treatment tolerability without impairing antitumor efficacy. Therefore, we have studied the influence of PCR on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity. In this crossover trial, patients with liver metastases of solid tumors were included and randomized to treatment with irinotecan preceded by 5 days of PCR (~ 30% caloric and ~ 70% protein restriction) during the first cycle and a second cycle preceded by a normal diet or vice versa. Pharmacokinetic blood sampling and biopsies of both healthy liver and liver metastases were performed. The primary end point was the relative difference in geometric means for the active metabolite SN‐38 concentration in healthy liver analyzed by a linear mixed model. No significant differences were seen in irinotecan (+ 16.8%, P = 0.22) and SN‐38 (+ 9.8%, P = 0.48) concentrations between PCR and normal diet in healthy liver, as well as in liver metastases (irinotecan: −38.8%, P = 0.05 and SN‐38: −13.8%, P = 0.50). PCR increased irinotecan plasma area under the curve from zero to 24 hours (AUC0–24h) with 7.1% (P = 0.04) compared with normal diet, whereas the SN‐38 plasma AUC0–24h increased with 50.3% (P 
ISSN:0009-9236
1532-6535
DOI:10.1002/cpt.2094