Evaluation of the Xpert HCV VL Fingerstick point-of-care assay and dried blood spot HCV-RNA testing as simplified diagnostic strategies among people who inject drugs in Catalonia, Spain

•The Xpert FS PoCT and the DBS-based HCV-RNA assay are simple and reliable methods for HCV testing in PWID.•The sensitivity and specificity were not significantly different between assays in our real-world setting.•50.0% of the participants preferred to receive the HCV-RNA results on the same day.•S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of drug policy 2020-06, Vol.80, p.102734-102734, Article 102734
Hauptverfasser: Saludes, V., Antuori, A., Lazarus, J.V., Folch, C., González-Gómez, S., González, N., Ibáñez, N., Colom, J., Matas, L., Casabona, J., Martró, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The Xpert FS PoCT and the DBS-based HCV-RNA assay are simple and reliable methods for HCV testing in PWID.•The sensitivity and specificity were not significantly different between assays in our real-world setting.•50.0% of the participants preferred to receive the HCV-RNA results on the same day.•Same-day delivery of PoCT results was feasible in 80% of the cases. Catalonia requires decentralized and simplified strategies for the diagnosis of viremic HCV infection among people who inject drugs (PWID). We aimed to perform a direct comparison of the diagnostic performance between two, single-step strategies for the screening and diagnosis of viremic HCV infection in PWID attending a drug consumption room (DCR) in Barcelona: i) on-site HCV-RNA testing using the point-of-care test (PoCT) Xpert HCV VL Fingerstick; and ii) on-site dried blood spots (DBS) collection for HCV-RNA testing at the laboratory (in-house assay). Additionally, we aimed to assess participants’ preferences in receiving HCV-RNA testing results and feasibility of same-day delivery of PoCT results. The real-world, clinical performance of these two strategies was established in comparison with the reference method (HCV viral load testing with the Xpert HCV Viral Load assay at the laboratory from venous plasma collected at the DCR). HCV genotypes/subtypes and HIV status were also determined by sequencing and serology, respectively. A questionnaire including preferences regarding the delivery of test results was administered. The prevalence of HCV-RNA was 63.0% (of which 25.8% were co-infected with HIV). The RNA-PoCT showed a sensitivity of 98.4% for detectable viral loads (>4 IU/mL) and of 100% for quantifiable viral loads (≥10, ≥1000 and ≥3000 IU/mL). For the DBS-based assay, a sensitivity of 93.7% was obtained for detectable viral loads, 96.7% for the quantifiable ≥10 IU/mL threshold, and 98.3% for both the quantifiable ≥1000 and ≥3000 IU/mL thresholds. No significant differences were detected between the sensitivity values of these two strategies, and the specificity was 100% in both cases. Half of the participants preferred to receive the HCV-RNA result on the same day, and 80% of participants received their RNA-PoCT results on the same day. Both the HCV-RNA PoCT and the DBS-based assay are highly reliable tools for the simplified diagnosis of viremic HCV infection among current PWID. These strategies allow for on-site sample collection and delivery of test results, facilitating decentralize
ISSN:0955-3959
1873-4758
DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102734