Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials Part 2: Potential Alternatives to the Use of Animals in Preclinical Trials
Dramatically rising costs in drug development are in large part because of the high failure rates in clinical phase trials. The poor correlation of animal studies to human toxicity and efficacy have led many developers to question the value of requiring animal studies in determining which drugs shou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JACC. Basic to translational science 2020-04, Vol.5 (4), p.387-397 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Dramatically rising costs in drug development are in large part because of the high failure rates in clinical phase trials. The poor correlation of animal studies to human toxicity and efficacy have led many developers to question the value of requiring animal studies in determining which drugs should enter in-human trials. Part 1 of this 2-part series examined some of the data regarding the tack of concordance between animal toxicity studies and human trials, as well as some of the potential reasons behind it. This second part of the series focuses on some alternatives to animal trials (hereafter referred to as animal research) as well as current regulatory discussions and developments regarding such alternatives. (C) 2020 The Author. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2452-302X 2452-302X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.03.010 |