Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted (RA) and standard laparoscopic gynecological surgery (S-LGS) in a tertiary care hospital, and evaluate the factors affecting the outcomes of RA-LGS to identify areas of improvement. A descriptive study. King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 201...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan 2020-03, Vol.30 (3), p.254-258
Hauptverfasser:	Rafique, Munazzah, Aziz, Tehmina, Al-Suwailem, Sahar
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adolescent Adult Aged Blood transfusion Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Humans Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - adverse effects Length of Stay Middle Aged Operative Time Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Retrospective Studies Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Robots Saudi Arabia Treatment Outcome Young Adult
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted (RA) and standard laparoscopic gynecological surgery (S-LGS) in a tertiary care hospital, and evaluate the factors affecting the outcomes of RA-LGS to identify areas of improvement. A descriptive study. King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 2013 to 2018. In this 5-year retrospective study, 65 LGS cases, including 37 RA-LGS and 28 S-LGS, in a single tertiary care hospital, were included. Demographic data, clinical pathological details, and complications of the cases were recorded. Surgeons performing RA-LGS were also interviewed regarding their training/experience, competency of surgical assistance, and suggestions for improving training. Operative times (3.70 ±0.96 vs. 2.07 ±0.78 h, p
ISSN:	1022-386X 1681-7168
DOI:	10.29271/jcpsp.2020.03.254