Sex bias and omission in neuroscience research is influenced by research model and journal, but not reported NIH funding

[Display omitted] •Sex bias and omission is present in neuroscience research.•Relatively few articles consider sex as an experimental variable.•Sex bias and omission vary considerably across research model organism.•Sex omission, but not bias, varies by journal.•Sex bias and omission do not vary with reported NIH funding. Neuroscience research has historically demonstrated sex bias that favors male over female research subjects, as well as sex omission, which is the lack of reporting sex. Here we analyzed the status of sex bias and omission in neuroscience research published across six different journals in 2017. Regarding sex omission, 16% of articles did not report sex. Regarding sex bias, 52% of neuroscience articles reported using both males and females, albeit only 15% of articles using both males and females reported assessing sex as an experimental variable. Overrepresentation of the sole use of males compared to females persisted (26% versus 5%, respectively). Sex bias and omission differed across research models, but not by reported NIH funding status. Sex omission differed across journals. These findings represent the latest information regarding the complex status of sex in neuroscience research and illustrate the continued need for thoughtful and informed action to enhance scientific discovery.