Post-mastectomy radiotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in T3N0 patients who do not receive chemotherapy
•PMRT is associated with improved survival in patients with pT3N0 breast cancer.•PMRT benefit is limited to pT3N0 patients who do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.•PMRT does not improve survival for cT3N0 disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.•PMRT may benefit patients with cT3N0 disease who respo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2020-04, Vol.145, p.229-237 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •PMRT is associated with improved survival in patients with pT3N0 breast cancer.•PMRT benefit is limited to pT3N0 patients who do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.•PMRT does not improve survival for cT3N0 disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.•PMRT may benefit patients with cT3N0 disease who respond poorly to chemotherapy.
There is limited retrospective evidence addressing the utility of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T3N0 breast cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) comparing overall survival (OS) in T3N0 patients treated with mastectomy alone (MTX) or with PMRT.
We performed a matched-cohort analysis of NCDB breast cancer patients with pT3N0 disease who did not receive NAC, or cT3N0 patients who received NAC treated between 2006 and 2014. Patients were matched for all available baseline characteristics using propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with stabilized weights.
We identified 13,901 eligible patients. In the pT3N0 cohort, median follow-up was 47 months for the MTX group and 50 months for the PMRT group. In the cT3N0 cohort, median follow-up was 44 months for the MTX group and 46 months for the PMRT group. OS was higher in pT3N0 patients treated with PMRT compared to MTX: 7-year OS of 74% vs. 65% (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.022 |