Impact of an enhanced recovery program for cesarean delivery on postoperative opioid use
•Cesarean delivery patients in the enhanced recovery program received fewer opioids.•Average pain scores remained mild despite the reduced opioid consumption.•Fewer than half the patients required an opioid within 24 h of discharge.•Early oral intake was not associated with increased anti-emetic req...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of obstetric anesthesia 2020-08, Vol.43, p.47-55 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Cesarean delivery patients in the enhanced recovery program received fewer opioids.•Average pain scores remained mild despite the reduced opioid consumption.•Fewer than half the patients required an opioid within 24 h of discharge.•Early oral intake was not associated with increased anti-emetic requirements.
Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgeries performed worldwide and the adoption of enhanced recovery programs for cesarean delivery is gaining popularity. We tested the hypothesis that implementation of an enhanced recovery program for cesarean delivery would be associated with a decrease in postoperative opioid consumption.
We compared a retrospective cohort of women delivered by elective cesarean delivery (January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) to a prospective cohort exposed to the enhanced recovery protocol (July 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018). The primary outcome was inpatient maternal opioid use, measured as total oral morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included postoperative 0–10 pain scores, length of stay, 30-day postoperative complication rates, and hospital re-admissions.
Data from 541 patients were analyzed. The enhanced recovery cohort used significantly less oral morphine equivalents compared with the pre-enhanced recovery cohort (60.3 mg vs 104.3 mg, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-289X 1532-3374 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.01.005 |