MRI versus 18 F-FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma: diagnostic performance and clinical relevance

To compare the diagnostic performance of MRI and F-FDG-PET/CT in detecting bone marrow involvement (BMI) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Two radiologists and two nuclear medicine specialists independently and blindly re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2020-04, Vol.30 (4), p.1927
Hauptverfasser: Lecouvet, Frédéric E, Boyadzhiev, Dimitar, Collette, Laurence, Berckmans, Maude, Michoux, Nicolas, Triqueneaux, Perrine, Pasoglou, Vassiliki, Jamar, François, Vekemans, Marie-Christiane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the diagnostic performance of MRI and F-FDG-PET/CT in detecting bone marrow involvement (BMI) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Two radiologists and two nuclear medicine specialists independently and blindly reviewed 84 pairs of MRI and PET/CT scans obtained in 73 MM patients. Readers assessed the presence and patterns of BMI. The best valuable comparator (BVC) for BMI was established by a panel review of all baseline and follow-up imaging, and biological and pathological information. Intra- and inter-reader agreement and correlation between MRI and PET/CT were assessed using the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (k) coefficient. Diagnostic performance of MRI and PET/CT in detecting BMI was evaluated from ROC characteristics. Association between imaging and biological, pathological, and clinical findings was assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests. Intra- and inter-reader agreement was very good for MRI (k = 0.90 [0.81; 1.00] and 0.88 [0.78; 0.98]). Intra- and inter-reader agreement was good for PET/CT (k = 0.80 [0.69; 0.91] and 0.71 [0.56; 0.86]). The sensitivity of MRI to detect BMI (97% [90%; 100%]) was significantly superior to that of PET/CT (76% [64%; 85%]) (p 
ISSN:1432-1084