Anti–pan-neurofascin IgG3 as a marker of fulminant autoimmune neuropathy

OBJECTIVETo identify and characterize patients with autoantibodies against different neurofascin (NF) isoforms. METHODSScreening of a large cohort of patient sera for anti-NF autoantibodies by ELISA and further characterization by cell-based assays, epitope mapping, and complement binding assays. RE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology : neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation 2019-09, Vol.6 (5)
Hauptverfasser: Stengel, Helena, Vural, Atay, Brunder, Anna-Michelle, Heinius, Annika, Appeltshauser, Luise, Fiebig, Bianca, Giese, Florian, Dresel, Christian, Papagianni, Aikaterini, Birklein, Frank, Weis, Joachim, Huchtemann, Tessa, Schmidt, Christian, Körtvelyessy, Peter, Villmann, Carmen, Meinl, Edgar, Sommer, Claudia, Leypoldt, Frank, Doppler, Kathrin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVETo identify and characterize patients with autoantibodies against different neurofascin (NF) isoforms. METHODSScreening of a large cohort of patient sera for anti-NF autoantibodies by ELISA and further characterization by cell-based assays, epitope mapping, and complement binding assays. RESULTSTwo different clinical phenotypes became apparent in this studyThe well-known clinical picture of subacute-onset severe sensorimotor neuropathy with tremor that is known to be associated with IgG4 autoantibodies against the paranodal isoform NF-155 was found in 2 patients. The second phenotype with a dramatic course of disease with tetraplegia and almost locked-in syndrome was associated with IgG3 autoantibodies against nodal and paranodal isoforms of NF in 3 patients. The epitope against which these autoantibodies were directed in this second phenotype was the common Ig domain found in all 3 NF isoforms. In contrast, anti–NF-155 IgG4 were directed against the NF-155–specific Fn3Fn4 domain. The description of a second phenotype of anti–NF-associated neuropathy is in line with some case reports of similar patients that were published in the last year. CONCLUSIONSOur results indicate that anti–pan-NF-associated neuropathy differs from anti–NF-155-associated neuropathy, and epitope and subclass play a major role in the pathogenesis and severity of anti–NF-associated neuropathy and should be determined to correctly classify patients, also in respect to possible differences in therapeutic response.
ISSN:2332-7812
2332-7812
DOI:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000603