Impact of different dose prescription schedules on EQD 2 in high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy of carcinoma cervix

To observe the effect of different high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy dose schedules on equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD ). It is a retrospective study involving 50 cervical cancer patients, who received external radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 25 fractions and underwent intracavi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of contemporary brachytherapy 2019-04, Vol.11 (2), p.189
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, Mohan, Thangaraj, Revathy, Alva, Ram Charith, Koushik, Kirthi, Ponni, Arul, Achar, Janaki Mg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To observe the effect of different high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy dose schedules on equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD ). It is a retrospective study involving 50 cervical cancer patients, who received external radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 25 fractions and underwent intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). Computed tomography (CT) simulation was done after insertion of the applicators. High-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) and organs at risk (OARs) such as bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were contoured. Four different plans were generated for each patient, with dose prescriptions of 5.5 Gy × 5 fractions (plan A), 6.5 Gy × 4 fractions (plan B), 7 Gy × 4 fractions (plan C), and 9 Gy × 2 fractions (plan D), delivered to CTV . The total EQD for 0.1 cm and 2 cm of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid as well as dose received by 90% of the CTV (D ) and point A were calculated. The values were analyzed and compared with available literature. The mean CTV volume was 47.12 ±13.8 cm . All plans delivered similar EQD for 0.1 cm and 2 cm of sigmoid. Plan D delivered lesser EQD compared to other plans for bladder, rectum, D CTVHR, and point A ( = 0.0001). Plan C delivered higher EQD to OARs compared to other plans ( = 0.001). Plan A, B, and plan C delivered similar EQD for D CTV and point A. EQD of bladder, rectum, sigmoid, D CTV , and point A were similar with 5.5 Gy × 5 fractions, 6.5 Gy × 4 fractions, and 7 Gy × 4 fractions, whereas EQD of 9 Gy × 2 fractions was significantly unfavorable compared to other schedules. Further clinical studies are recommended to observe clinical outcomes.
ISSN:1689-832X
DOI:10.5114/jcb.2019.84586