High and low on-treatment platelet reactivity to P2Y 12 inhibitors in a contemporary cohort of acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
There is compelling evidence supporting the association between high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR) to clopidogrel with atherothrombotic and bleeding events, respectively. However, it is uncertain if current cutoff values should be used in prasu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Thrombosis research 2019-03, Vol.175, p.95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There is compelling evidence supporting the association between high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR) to clopidogrel with atherothrombotic and bleeding events, respectively. However, it is uncertain if current cutoff values should be used in prasugrel- or ticagrelor-treated subjects. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic (PD) efficacy of P2Y
antagonists in a contemporary real-world population.
This PD study included 988 patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and receiving dual therapy with aspirin and a P2Y
inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor). Platelet function was assessed at day 1 and day 30 post-PCI by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, multiple electrode aggregometry and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) assay.
Clopidogrel-treated patients (n = 324) had greater platelet reactivity than those receiving ticagrelor (n = 469) or prasugrel (n = 195) at both time points (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1879-2472 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.01.021 |