Convergence insufficiency in Chinese high school students
The frequency of convergence insufficiency was determined in a sample of Chinese high school students. The associations between the frequency of convergence insufficiency, gender, refractive error and accommodative insufficiency were investigated. This was a single-site, prospective cross-sectional...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical and experimental optometry 2019-03, Vol.102 (2), p.166-171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The frequency of convergence insufficiency was determined in a sample of Chinese high school students. The associations between the frequency of convergence insufficiency, gender, refractive error and accommodative insufficiency were investigated.
This was a single-site, prospective cross-sectional study. In total, 928 eligible teenagers (mean age 15.9 ± 0.8) from a local high school in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China participated in this study. Refraction and binocular vision tests were performed on all eligible participants. The following three signs were used to classify participants: sign 1, exophoria at near at least 4
▵
greater than at far; sign 2, receded near point of convergence (≥ 6-cm break point); and sign 3, insufficient near positive fusional vergence (that is, failing Sheard's criterion or ≤ 15
▵
break point). Diagnostic groups of convergence insufficiency classification were defined as follows: (1) 3-Sign convergence insufficiency (all three signs present); (2) 2-Sign convergence insufficiency (sign 1 plus sign 2 or 3); (3) 1-Sign convergence insufficiency (sign 1 only); and (4) no convergence insufficiency (that is, participants not classified into one of the above groups).
The number and frequency of individuals with 3-Sign, 2-Sign, and 1-Sign convergence insufficiency as well as no convergence insufficiency group were 25 (2.7 per cent), 119 (12.8 per cent), 303 (32.6 per cent) and 481 (51.8 per cent), respectively. Gender (χ
2
= 36.6, df = 3, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0816-4622 1444-0938 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cxo.12838 |