A Development and Overview of the Use of Chemotherapy and the Role of Radiotherapy and Surgery in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Pancreatic Tumor and Cancer in the Current 5-year Center Practice
Chemotherapy (CHT), surgery and radiotherapy (RT) are essential modalities in the treatment of pancreatic malignancies. Their use in practice may be influenced by a number of factors. Retrospective analysis of CHT, surgery and RT indications and CHT results in patients reported with pancreatic tumor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Klinická onkologie 2018, Vol.31 (Supplementum1), p.171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | cze |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Chemotherapy (CHT), surgery and radiotherapy (RT) are essential modalities in the treatment of pancreatic malignancies. Their use in practice may be influenced by a number of factors.
Retrospective analysis of CHT, surgery and RT indications and CHT results in patients reported with pancreatic tumor in Pilsen in 2012-2016.
A total of 348 patients with median age 68 (19-89) years with newly diagnosed pancreatic tumor, resp., with histology/cytology verified carcinoma in 74.5% cases, with v. s. carcinoma without verification in 21% and with other malignancy not further analyzed here in 4.5% (mostly neuroendocrine tumor). In patients with generalized malignancy (n = 195), exploratory laparotomy was performed in 23% to get tissue samples or verify staging - palliative anastomoses were done in 25% of operated patients, CHT was performed in 29% of the generalized tumors, palliative RT of tumor was performed in 1 patient, and RT of metastases in 3 patients. In patients with local or regional nodal affection (n = 137) laparotomy was done in 59%, R0 resection in 34 (42%) of 81 operated, R1 in 6%, palliative anastomoses were done in 17% and irreversible electroporation in one patients, CHT or radiochemotherapy after R0 and R1 resections was provided in 61% operated patients. The most commonly used CHT was monotherapy with gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX. The indication of CHT in cytology/histology verified generalized cancers and with excluding patients refusing CHT was proposed in 2012 to 16%, in 2014 to 49% and in 2016 to 84% of patients. In the case of a local or regional nodal involvement the CHT was proposed to 40, 55 and 86% of patients. Median overall survival in generalized tumor patients receiving CHT (n = 137) vs. not-receiving CHT (n = 56) was 2 vs. 8 months (p = 0.0001), and in the local or regional nodal involvement patients receiving CHT (n = 74) vs. not-receiving CHT (n = 62) was 5 vs. 16 months (p = 0.0001).
CHT and surgery are the dominant treatment modalities. There has been a marked increase in the CHT and histology/cytology verifications indications, with a major factor being a clinician evaluation of a patient to be fit for CHT and its benefit or to complete pancreatic tumor verification. With still very limited results in pancreatic cancer treatment, a careful assessment of each patients indication, respecting patients desire, is always required, knowing that even in the case of advanced disease, CHT can bring benefit, albeit limited.Key words: pancr |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0862-495X |