Correction to: HbA 1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients
The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1].The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as havi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cardiovascular diabetology 2018-03, Vol.17 (1), p.42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 42 |
container_title | Cardiovascular diabetology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Hjellestad, Iren D Astor, Marianne C Nilsen, Roy M Søfteland, Eirik Jonung, Torbjørn |
description | The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1].The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM.All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions.The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum.The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12933-018-0686-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_29566676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29566676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_295666763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjs1KAzEUhYMgbf15ADdyXyCazLSZ1J0UpQ_gvmQyt2Mkkwy5SaFufHUj6NrVOfB9HA5jd1I8SKnVI8lm27ZcSM2F0op_XrCVXHcb3ui1WLIrog8hZKeVXLBls90opTq1Yl-7mBLa7GKAHJ9g3z-DtHDCRIUgJuNh9MVGwoo9JhNsbUgZDIGBCfN7HCqCwZkx_Gi19FiNyrx3ua64ACdDtniTgEoaMZ1hNtlhyHTDLo_GE97-5jW7f3152-35XPoJh8Oc3GTS-fD3uP1X-AYraVOJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correction to: HbA 1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>SpringerOpen</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Hjellestad, Iren D ; Astor, Marianne C ; Nilsen, Roy M ; Søfteland, Eirik ; Jonung, Torbjørn</creator><creatorcontrib>Hjellestad, Iren D ; Astor, Marianne C ; Nilsen, Roy M ; Søfteland, Eirik ; Jonung, Torbjørn</creatorcontrib><description>The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1].The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM.All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions.The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum.The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12933-018-0686-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29566676</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Cardiovascular diabetology, 2018-03, Vol.17 (1), p.42</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29566676$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hjellestad, Iren D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astor, Marianne C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsen, Roy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søfteland, Eirik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonung, Torbjørn</creatorcontrib><title>Correction to: HbA 1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients</title><title>Cardiovascular diabetology</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Diabetol</addtitle><description>The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1].The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM.All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions.The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum.The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article.</description><issn>1475-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjs1KAzEUhYMgbf15ADdyXyCazLSZ1J0UpQ_gvmQyt2Mkkwy5SaFufHUj6NrVOfB9HA5jd1I8SKnVI8lm27ZcSM2F0op_XrCVXHcb3ui1WLIrog8hZKeVXLBls90opTq1Yl-7mBLa7GKAHJ9g3z-DtHDCRIUgJuNh9MVGwoo9JhNsbUgZDIGBCfN7HCqCwZkx_Gi19FiNyrx3ua64ACdDtniTgEoaMZ1hNtlhyHTDLo_GE97-5jW7f3152-35XPoJh8Oc3GTS-fD3uP1X-AYraVOJ</recordid><startdate>20180322</startdate><enddate>20180322</enddate><creator>Hjellestad, Iren D</creator><creator>Astor, Marianne C</creator><creator>Nilsen, Roy M</creator><creator>Søfteland, Eirik</creator><creator>Jonung, Torbjørn</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180322</creationdate><title>Correction to: HbA 1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients</title><author>Hjellestad, Iren D ; Astor, Marianne C ; Nilsen, Roy M ; Søfteland, Eirik ; Jonung, Torbjørn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_295666763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hjellestad, Iren D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astor, Marianne C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsen, Roy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søfteland, Eirik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonung, Torbjørn</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular diabetology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hjellestad, Iren D</au><au>Astor, Marianne C</au><au>Nilsen, Roy M</au><au>Søfteland, Eirik</au><au>Jonung, Torbjørn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correction to: HbA 1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular diabetology</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Diabetol</addtitle><date>2018-03-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><pages>42-</pages><eissn>1475-2840</eissn><abstract>The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1].The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM.All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions.The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum.The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>29566676</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12933-018-0686-z</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1475-2840 |
ispartof | Cardiovascular diabetology, 2018-03, Vol.17 (1), p.42 |
issn | 1475-2840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_29566676 |
source | PubMed (Medline); SpringerOpen; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access |
title | Correction to: HbA 1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T18%3A23%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correction%20to:%20HbA%201c%20versus%20oral%20glucose%20tolerance%20test%20as%20a%20method%20to%20diagnose%20diabetes%20mellitus%20in%20vascular%20surgery%20patients&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20diabetology&rft.au=Hjellestad,%20Iren%20D&rft.date=2018-03-22&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.pages=42-&rft.eissn=1475-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12933-018-0686-z&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E29566676%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29566676&rfr_iscdi=true |