Correction to: HbA 1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients

The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1].The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as havi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular diabetology 2018-03, Vol.17 (1), p.42
Hauptverfasser: Hjellestad, Iren D, Astor, Marianne C, Nilsen, Roy M, Søfteland, Eirik, Jonung, Torbjørn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1].The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM.All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions.The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum.The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article.
ISSN:1475-2840