Bowel function and quality of life after colostomy in individuals with spinal cord injury
Objective: To evaluate the effect of colostomy on bowel function and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: Department for Spinal Cord Injuries and Departments of Gastroenterology and Radiology, Rigshospitalet. Particip...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of spinal cord medicine 2016-05, Vol.39 (3), p.281-289 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To evaluate the effect of colostomy on bowel function and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study.
Setting: Department for Spinal Cord Injuries and Departments of Gastroenterology and Radiology, Rigshospitalet.
Participants: Eighteen individuals with SCI and a colostomy performed post injury, 12 males, 6 females, 8 with tetraplegia and 10 with paraplegia. Median age at time of study was 49.9 years, years since lesion was 3-56 years, and time since colostomy was performed 0.5 to 20 years.
Interventions: Questionnaires and measurement of gastrointestinal transit time (GITT).
Outcome measures: Retrospective data collection from patient records, a questionnaire on bowel management pre and post colostomy, quality of life (QoL) by SF-36, and GITT.
Results: Seventy-two percent significantly reduced their use of time on bowel emptying after the colostomy. All but one reported being content with the colostomy. Thirty-nine percent reported one or more problems related to the colostomy. Seventy-five percent had a GITT within normal range for able-bodied populations. When disregarding the physical component, QoL was not significantly lower in the total study group compared to a Danish norm group, but significantly lower when compared the subgroup of persons with tetraplegia.
Conclusion: A colostomy reduces the time necessary for bowel management. The majority of individuals with SCI and a colostomy did not perceive bowel management as being a problem. The results indicate that colostomy is a favourable option for individuals with SCI, who spend long hours on bowel management and for whom non-invasive procedures did not improve the situation enough. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1079-0268 2045-7723 |
DOI: | 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000006 |