A comparison of the effects of ketamine and remifentanil on renal functions in coronary artery bypass graft surgery

We have investigated the effects of ketamine-based and remifentanil-based anesthetic protocol on perioperative serum cystatin-C levels, and creatinine and/or cystatin-C-based eGFR equations in terms of acute kidney injury in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Using a simple randomization m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renal failure 2015-05, Vol.37 (5), p.819-826
Hauptverfasser: Demir, Aslı, Yılmaz, Fatma Meric, Ceylan, Cavit, Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan, Uçar, Perihan, Züngün, Cevdet, Guclu, Cigdem Yildirim, Ünal, Utku, Karadeniz, Umit, Günertem, Eren, Lafci, Gokhan, Çağlı, Kerim, Özgök, Ayşegül
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have investigated the effects of ketamine-based and remifentanil-based anesthetic protocol on perioperative serum cystatin-C levels, and creatinine and/or cystatin-C-based eGFR equations in terms of acute kidney injury in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Using a simple randomization method (coin tossing), patients were divided into the two groups and not-blinded to the anesthetist. Remifentanil-midazolam-propofol or ketamine-midazolam-propofol-based anesthetic regimen was chosen. Different eGFR formulas using creatinine (MDRD, CKD-EPI, Cockrauft Gault); cystatin-C (eGFR1, eGFR2) or a combination of creatinine and cystatin-C (eGFR 3) were used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs). High-sensitive troponin T was used to determine if ketamine use in coronary surgery contributed to myocardial cell damage. Thirty-seven patients were included in the study (remifentanil group = 19, ketamine Group = 18). Urea, creatinine, cystatin-C levels were comparable between the groups in all the measurement times and also postoperative day 2 samples showed statistically higher results compared to baseline (p 
ISSN:0886-022X
1525-6049
DOI:10.3109/0886022X.2015.1015390