Suspected Viral Maculopapular Eruptions: An Audit of Practice

Background: Consensus is lacking about investigations to be performed for viral eruptions. Aims: Audit of investigative practices for viral eruption. Methods: Retrospective study of patients hospitalized for viral eruption, divided into 2 groups: suspected viral infection (SV), with a clinical prese...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dermatology (Basel) 2013-10, Vol.227 (1), p.72-77
Hauptverfasser: Baudoux, L., Ingen-Housz-Oro, S., Corneille, J., Sbidian, E., Duong, T.A., Valeyrie-Allanore, L., Bagot, M., Chosidow, O., Wolkenstein, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Consensus is lacking about investigations to be performed for viral eruptions. Aims: Audit of investigative practices for viral eruption. Methods: Retrospective study of patients hospitalized for viral eruption, divided into 2 groups: suspected viral infection (SV), with a clinical presentation suggesting a specific virus, and nonspecific suspected viral infection (NSV). Investigations of results and costs of virology tests. Results: We included 59 patients, 25 in the SV and 34 in the NSV group. Measles was suspected in 21/25 SV patients and confirmed in 20 (95%). The causal agent was confirmed in 6 NSV cases (17.6%), including 2 HIV infections. The median number of virology tests was 7 (1-14) and the median cost was EUR 144, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Virology testing is useful when a putative virus is clinically suspected. HIV serology screening should be systematically performed.
ISSN:1018-8665
1421-9832
DOI:10.1159/000352078