Comparison of topogram-based body size indices for CT dose consideration and scan protocol optimization

Purpose: To retrospectively compare different topogram-based patient body size indices and to determine the optimal topogram-based body size index as a basis for body computed tomography (CT) dose consideration and scan protocol optimization. Methods: Forty-three routine thorax and abdomen CT scans...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2012-06, Vol.39 (6), p.3456-3465
Hauptverfasser: Li, Baojun, Behrman, Richard H., Norbash, Alexander M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To retrospectively compare different topogram-based patient body size indices and to determine the optimal topogram-based body size index as a basis for body computed tomography (CT) dose consideration and scan protocol optimization. Methods: Forty-three routine thorax and abdomen CT scans are studied retrospectively, with patient ages ranging from 18 to 67 yr. The individual patient’s water-equivalent diameter (D w ) of the scanned body region is computed from CT DICOM images as the “gold standard,” after first converting from Hounsfield units values to μa values, where μ is the normalized tissue attenuation coefficient and a is the area per pixel. Four topogram-based body size indices [average diameter ( D ¯ ) , girth (G), topogram projection area (E topo), and improved topogram projection area ( E topo ' ) ] are computed and correlated with D w using linear regression analysis. Specifically, D ¯ is calculated by averaging the coronal and sagittal diameters; G is computed by modeling the patient’s cross-section as an ellipse; E topo is the product of the mean topogram pixel value and the width of the scanned body region; and ( E topo ' ) incorporates E topo with correction of patient miscentering and water attenuation coefficient. The accuracy of these four approaches for estimation of D w is assessed using linear regression models. Results are given in terms of 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Regression analysis results in four different linear models. The standard error (95% CI) for estimation ofD w from D ¯ and G was ±2.8 and ±3.1 cm, respectively (p = 0.297). The standard error for estimation of D w from E topo was significantly less than that from D ¯ (±2.1 cm, p 
ISSN:0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI:10.1118/1.4718569