Risk prediction in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm

Abstract Objectives. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate three risk scoring methods in predicting outcome after elective endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Design. A Zenith stent graft was employed in 205 patients during years 2001-2005. Results. The 30-day postop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ 2010, Vol.44 (2), p.125-128
Hauptverfasser: Nevala, Terhi, Biancari, Fausto, Perälä, Jukka, Manninen, Hannu, Aho, Pekka-Sakari, Matsi, Pekka, Mäkinen, Kimmo, Roth, Wolf-Dieter, Ylönen, Kari, Lepäntalo, Mauri
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate three risk scoring methods in predicting outcome after elective endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Design. A Zenith stent graft was employed in 205 patients during years 2001-2005. Results. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2.9%. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed that the Glasgow aneurysm score (GAS) (AUC: 0.843, p=0.004) and the Giles' score (AUC 0.815, p=0.009) had a rather large area under the curve in predicting 30-day mortality rate. The modified Leiden score was much less accurate (AUC: 0.594). The best cut-off value for the GAS in predicting 30-day mortality was 90 (0.6% vs. 17.9%, p
ISSN:1401-7431
1651-2006
DOI:10.3109/14017430903420590