First Safety and Response Results of a Randomized Phase III Study with Liposomal Platin in the Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN)
Background: Cisplatin is one of the most active chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). However, its clinical efficacy is limited by its renal and hematotoxicity profile. In a randomized, multicenter phase III trial, we replaced...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anticancer research 2008-11, Vol.28 (6B), p.3961-3964 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Cisplatin is one of the most active chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma
of the head and neck (SCCHN). However, its clinical efficacy is limited by its renal and hematotoxicity profile. In a randomized,
multicenter phase III trial, we replaced conventional cisplatin by a liposomal formulation of cisplatin (lipoplatin) and compared
the safety and efficacy profiles of patients in the two treatment arms. Patients and Methods: Main inclusion criteria were:
histologically confirmed SCCHN, age between 18-75 years with sufficient renal function. Main endpoints for this interims analysis
were hemato- and nephrotoxicity. First response data were collected. Results: Forty-six patients were evaluable for outcome
and toxicity. Grade III and IV hematotoxicity were more frequent in the cisplatin arm (31.7% vs. 12%), with grade IV leucopenia
occurring in 22.2% . However, 16% of the patients in that treatment arm experienced grade III anemia compared to only 9.5%
treated with the cisplatin regimen. A total 4% of the patients in the lipoplatin arm developed grade IV neuropathy, whereas
in the cisplatin arm, 19% developed grade III neuropathy and none developed grade IV. The renal toxicity profile of both drugs
also showed marked differences. In the cisplatin arm, 23.8% of patients suffered grade III toxicity. In contrast, no grade
III or IV renal toxicity occurred in patients treated with lipoplatin. The efficacy results showed 38.8% objective partial
remission in the cisplatin arm vs. 19% in the lipoplatin arm. However 64% of the patients achieved stable disease while being
treated with lipoplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), vs. 50% in the cisplatin/5-FU arm. Conclusion: Liposomal cisplatin seems to
reduce both the renal and hematological toxicity to a clinically relevant extent as compared to conventional cisplatin. The
clinical benefit rate is similar for both regimens. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0250-7005 1791-7530 |