Risk of thrombogenicity among nonionic radiocontrast agents
Several contrast agents have been approved in the United States for radiographic imaging purposes. Most of the older ionic, high-osmolar contrast agents are no longer used because of their side effect profile. Therefore, newer nonionic, low or iso-osmolar contrast agents have been widely accepted as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of invasive cardiology 2008-07, Vol.20 (7), p.349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Several contrast agents have been approved in the United States for radiographic imaging purposes. Most of the older ionic, high-osmolar contrast agents are no longer used because of their side effect profile. Therefore, newer nonionic, low or iso-osmolar contrast agents have been widely accepted as an alternative due to their improved tolerability and safety. We investigated the thrombogenicity of the 6 different nonionic radiocontrast media in terms of their platelet reactivity and noted some minor differences among them. In the 50% contrast concentration group, all of the nonionic contrast agents inhibited aggregation, whereas in the 10% contrast concentration group, all agents showed similar aggregation curves in comparison to the normal control. At 50% contrast concentration, the inhibitory effect of aggregation appeared to be related to the inhibition of calcium mobilization, which may be one of the mechanistic effects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1557-2501 |