The principle of upper airway unidirectional flow facilitates breathing in humans

1 Departments of Anesthesia and Critical Care, and 2 Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Submitted 1 May 2008 ; accepted in final form 29 June 2008 Upper airway unidirectional breathing, nose in and mouth out, is used by panting dogs to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied physiology (1985) 2008-09, Vol.105 (3), p.854-858
Hauptverfasser: Jiang, Yandong, Liang, Yafen, Kacmarek, Robert M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:1 Departments of Anesthesia and Critical Care, and 2 Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Submitted 1 May 2008 ; accepted in final form 29 June 2008 Upper airway unidirectional breathing, nose in and mouth out, is used by panting dogs to facilitate heat removal via water evaporation from the respiratory system. Why some humans instinctively employ the same breathing pattern during respiratory distress is still open to question. We hypothesized that 1 ) humans unconsciously perform unidirectional breathing because it improves breathing efficiency, 2 ) such an improvement is achieved by bypassing upper airway dead space, and 3 ) the magnitude of the improvement is inversely proportional to the tidal volume. Four breathing patterns were performed in random order in 10 healthy volunteers first with normal breathing effort, then with variable tidal volumes: mouth in and mouth out (MMB); nose in and nose out (NNB); nose in and mouth out (NMB); and mouth in and nose out (MNB). We found that unidirectional breathing bypasses anatomical dead space and improves breathing efficiency. At tidal volumes of 380 ml, the functional anatomical dead space during NMB (81 ± 31 ml) or MNB (101 ± 20 ml) was significantly lower than that during MMB (148 ± 15 ml) or NNB (130 ± 13 ml) (all P < 0.001), and the breathing efficiency obtained with NMB (78 ± 9%) or MNB (73 ± 6%) was significantly higher than that with MMB (61 ± 6%) or NNB (66 ± 3%) (all P < 0.001). The improvement in breathing efficiency increased as tidal volume decreased. Unidirectional breathing results in a significant reduction in functional anatomical dead space and improvement in breathing efficiency. We suggest this may be the reason that such a breathing pattern is preferred during respiratory distress. pursed lip breathing; breathing efficiency; anatomical dead space; respiratory failure; panting Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. M. Kacmarek, Dept. of Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Ellison 401, Boston, MA 02114 (e-mail: rkacmarek{at}partners.org )
ISSN:8750-7587
1522-1601
DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.90599.2008