How Do Brain Areas Communicate During the Processing of Noxious Stimuli? An Analysis of Laser-Evoked Event-Related Potentials Using the Granger Causality Index
1 Biological and Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, and 2 Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany Submitted 15 August 2007; accepted in final form 10 March 2008 Several imaging techniques have identified diff...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 2008-05, Vol.99 (5), p.2220-2231 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1 Biological and Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, and 2 Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
Submitted 15 August 2007;
accepted in final form 10 March 2008
Several imaging techniques have identified different brain areas involved in the processing of noxious stimulation and thus in the constitution of pain. However, only little is known how these brain areas communicate with one another after activation by stimulus processing and which areas directionally affect or modulate the activity of succeeding areas. One measure for the analysis of such interactions is represented by the Granger Causality Index (GCI). In applying time-varying bivariate and partial variants of this concept (tvGCI), the aim of the present study was to investigate the interaction of neural activities between a set of scalp electrodes that best represent the brain electrical neural activity of major cortical areas involved in the processing of noxious laser-heat stimuli and their variation in time. Bivariate and partial tvGCIs were calculated within four different intervals of laser-evoked event-related potentials (LEPs) including a baseline period prior to stimulus application and three intervals immediately following stimulus application, i.e., between 170 and 200 ms (at the N2 component), between 260 and 320 ms (P2 component), and between 320 and 400 ms (P3 component of LEPs). Results show some similarities, but also some striking differences between bivariate and partial tvGCIs. These differences might be explained by the nature of bivariate and partial tvGCIs. However, both tvGCI approaches revealed a directed interaction between medial and lateral electrodes of the centroparietal region. This result was interpreted as a directed interaction between the anterior cingulate cortex and the secondary somatosensory cortex and the insula, structures that are significantly involved in the constitution of pain.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. Weiss, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Institute of Psychology, Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, D-07737 Jena, Germany (E-mail: thomas.weiss{at}uni-jena.de ) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.00912.2007 |