Evaluation of the Stimulant Content of Dietary Supplements Marketed as "Ephedra-Free"
Background: With the removal of stimulant herb ephe-dra from the market, dietary supplement manufacturers are coming out with many ephedra-free products. Some of these products appear to simply replace ephedra with stimulants by another name. Objective: To determine the stimulant content of dietary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of herbal pharmacotherapy 2007, Vol.7 (1), p.65-72 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: With the removal of stimulant herb ephe-dra from the market, dietary supplement manufacturers are coming out with many ephedra-free products. Some of these products appear to simply replace ephedra with stimulants by another name.
Objective: To determine the stimulant content of dietary supplements marketed as ephedra-free.
Design: Survey of the ingredients of dietary supplements that are stated as "ephedra-free" in the label or promotional material.
Results: Out of 36 products marketed as ephedra-free, 32 (89%) contained a methylxanthine such as caffeine or theobromine, 21 (58%) contained the stimulant synephrine, and 20 (56%) contained both a methylxanthine and synephrine.
Limitations: The results of this evaluation pertain only to products discovered through Internet and database searching.
Conclusions: Most dietary supplement makers have substituted stimulants by a different name for ephedra in their "ephedra-free" products. Patients need to be advised that ephedra-free products are not necessarily stimulant free and may present a significant risk. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-8940 1522-9106 |
DOI: | 10.1080/J157v07n01_06 |