Efficacy and safety of iguratimod compared with placebo and salazosulfapyridine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study

Abstract We conducted a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of iguratimod in 376 Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis to compare the efficacy and safety of the drug with those of placebo and salazosulfapyridine. In the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 respo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Modern rheumatology 2007-02, Vol.17 (1), p.1-9
Hauptverfasser: Hara, Masako, Abe, Tohru, Sugawara, Sachiko, Mizushima, Yutaka, Hoshi, Keiko, Irimajiri, Shoichiro, Hashimoto, Hiroshi, Yoshino, Shinichi, Matsui, Nobuo, Nobunaga, Masashi, Nakano, Shigeyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract We conducted a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of iguratimod in 376 Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis to compare the efficacy and safety of the drug with those of placebo and salazosulfapyridine. In the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response rate, iguratimod was superior to placebo (53.8% versus 17.2%; Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001) and was not inferior to salazosulfapyridine (63.1% versus 57.7%, 95% confidence interval for the rate difference, −7.9% to 18.7%). Iguratimod began exhibiting its therapeutic effect within 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment and was effective even in patients who had a poor response to previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No statistically significant difference was noted in the incidence of adverse reactions between iguratimod and salazosulfapyridine. The study results suggest that iguratimod could become a new option for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
ISSN:1439-7595
1439-7609
DOI:10.3109/s10165-006-0542-y