Impact of interseed attenuation and tissue composition for permanent prostate implants

The purpose is to evaluate the impact of interseed attenuation and prostate composition for prostate treatment plans with I 125 permanent seed implants using the Monte Carlo (MC) method. The effect of seed density (number of seeds per prostate unit volume) is specifically investigated. The study foc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2006-03, Vol.33 (3), p.595-604
Hauptverfasser: Carrier, Jean-François, Beaulieu, Luc, Therriault-Proulx, François, Roy, René
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose is to evaluate the impact of interseed attenuation and prostate composition for prostate treatment plans with I 125 permanent seed implants using the Monte Carlo (MC) method. The effect of seed density (number of seeds per prostate unit volume) is specifically investigated. The study focuses on treatment plans that were generated for clinical cases. For each plan, four different dose calculation techniques are compared: TG-43 based calculation, superposition MC, full MC with water prostate, and full MC with realistic prostate tissue. The prostate tissue description is from the ICRP report 23 (W. S. Snyer, M. J. Cook, E. S. Nasset, L. R. Karkhausen, G. P. Howells, and I. H. Tipton, “Report of the task group on reference man,” Technical Report 23, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1974). According to the comparisons, the seed density has an influence on interseed attenuation. A plan with a typical low seed density ( 42 0.6 mCi seeds in a 26 cm 3 prostate) suffers a 1.2% drop in the CTV D 90 value due to interseed attenuation. A drop of 3.0% is calculated for a higher seed density (75 0.3 mCi seeds, same prostate). The influence of the prostate composition is similar for all seed densities and prostate sizes. The difference between MC simulations in water and MC simulations in prostate tissue is between 4.4% and 4.8% for the D 90 parameter. Overall, the effect on D 90 is ranging from 5.8% to 12.8% when comparing clinically approved TG-43 and MC simulations in prostate tissue. The impact varies from one patient to the other and depends on the prostate size and the number of seeds. This effect can reach a significant level when reporting correlations between clinical effect and deposited dose.
ISSN:0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI:10.1118/1.2168295