Treatment of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas Based on WHO Classification
A single institution prospective trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of biotherapy or chemotherapy in metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The choice of therapy was based on the revised histological classification criteria of the WHO in an effort to define a standardized protocol fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anticancer research 2005-11, Vol.25 (6C), p.4463-4469 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A single institution prospective trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of biotherapy or chemotherapy in metastatic
neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The choice of therapy was based on the revised histological classification criteria of the
WHO in an effort to define a standardized protocol for therapy of these cancers. Patients with well-differentiated NECs (WD-NECs;
n=11) received therapy with octreotide long-acting release and interferon-α-2b for a maximum of 1 year; cases with poorly-differentiated
NECs (PD-NECs; n=8) were given combination cisplatin, L-leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy for a maximum of 9 cycles.
Five patients (4 with WD-NECs) had carcinoid syndrome. Among the patients with WD-NECs (median follow-up 20 months, range
4-40), 4 had partial responses and 7 had stable disease. In patients with PD-NECs (median follow-up 10.5 months, range 3-30),
3 had partial response, 2 stable disease, and the disease progressed in 3 cases. The 2-year survival rate in WD-NECs and PD-NECs
was 88% and 66%, respectively. Grade 3-4 side-effects were limited to 9% thrombocytopenia and 12.5% neutropenia. Both these
treatment regimens had a good therapeutic index and compared favourably with those previously reported for metastatic WD-NECs
and PD-NECs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0250-7005 1791-7530 |